Loading...
2014-04-17CITY OF BEVERLY PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION: Community Preservation Committee SUBCOMMITTEE: DATE: April 17, 2014 LOCATION: Beverly City Hall, Third Floor Conference Room B MEMBERS PRESENT: Wendy Pearl — Chairperson, Robert Buchsbaum, Marilyn McCrory, Leland McDonough, Lincoln Williams, Henry Pizzo MEMBERS ABSENT: John Thomson, Heather Richter,Darien Crimmin OTHERS PRESENT: Amy Maxner, Environmental Planner; RECORDER: Craig Schuster The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. Special Application (Emergency Situation) Application Process The Committee reviewed Maxner's draft of the special application and had minor word and content changes to better clarify the application. There was discussion and it was agreed by the Committee this application will be incorporated into the CPCs guidelines. Williams moves to approve the Special Application as amended. Seconded by McCrory. The motion carries with all members in favor. Review Sample Memorandums of Approval/Understanding (MOA/MOU) The Committee reviewed and discussed sample MOA's from other communities. It was noted that there cannot be one size fits all MOA for all projects because there are different project categories (open space, historic, etc.) as well differing project complexities. Maxner noted Gloucester uses one MOA for all projects as its template and then adjusts the MOA as necessary for particular projects. Maxner noted to the Committee, for consideration of inclusion into the MOA tax attestation. The Committee generally agreed with this suggestion but will have to be further reviewed. The Committee discussed how does State procurement law work with the MOA, will the CPC require a project coming before the CPC to be procured per Massachusetts General Laws and does it need to be mentioned in the MOA? It was agreed by all Committee members this needs to be further researched. CPA Project Signage The Committee discussed signage based on Maxner's handout picturing various types of CPC signage from other communities. Maxner noted that other communities buy a number of signs that are lent out to the projects for display during construction and returned to the CPC for reuse. The Committee discussed various elements of signs to be used on CPC projects, types (permanent, Community Preservation Committee 04 -17 -14 Meeting Minutes Page I of 3 temporary, special recognition), materials (aluminum, vinyl banners, bronze plaques), fonts, language, and other symbols (City seal on sign, Gloucester example good use of fonts and language), and colors (consistent with other City of Beverly signage). The result of the discussion was sign requirements need to be written into the CPC's MOAs, the required sign type, wording, etc. for each project, will be decided by the CPC based on the nature of the project, the CPC will purchase temporary signs but will require the applicant to fund a permanent sign if required by the CPC, and let the application process help determine the sign template. The Committee noted the Gloucester sign layout is a good starting point to model after. Since the CPC will be purchasing the temporary signs the Committee directed Maxner to research the legal requirements for procurement of these signs. The Committee also asked Maxner to research if there are any City sign requirements already in place that the CPC could use as a standard. Full Funding Application Review Procedures Pearl noted the full applications will soon be submitted (May 1, 2014), so the Committee needs to discuss how best to handle the review of these applications prior to the May 15, 2014 CPC meeting. The Committee suggested ranking the applications individually but it would be hard to compare them equally since the applications will be submitted under different categories (Open Space, Historic, Recreation, etc.). Scoring the applications by meeting certain criteria was discussed by the Committee but was ruled out because not all applications could meet the criteria. The Committee decided since this is the first time the CPC is going through this application process to rank the applications within their respective categories and then use the information learned from the application process to develop some objective criteria for next year's applications. Pearl asked how the Committee is going to keep track of their review criteria. Maxner commented that she will prepare a criteria sheet and attach them to the applications for the Committee members use during review. Maxner noted she would assemble the applications into packets and deliver to the members. The Committee asked Maxner to create a similar table as she did with the Pre -Apps. Maxner notes she will place links to the full applications on the CPC website, whether within the table or separately on the main webpage. Upcoming CPC Tentative Meetings It was agreed to schedule the following meeting dates May 15, 2014 May 29, 2014 and June 19, 2014. The Committee noted that establishing the meeting schedule beyond June will depend on how many applications are received. Other Business Maxner provided administrative updates by noting the Bonding 101 webinar hosted by the Coalition last month. She noted the webinar was informative and noted that funding of bonds can only be Community Preservation Committee 04 -17 -14 Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 based on the funds raised from the local surcharge, a 2/3 vote is needed by the City Council to pass a bonding measure, city bonding capacity has to be considered, it is the CPC's responsibility to recommend the structure of the bond (amount, number of years, etc.) to the City council with Finance Direcotr Bryant Ayles's help, and bonding is commonly used by other CPC's in the Commonwealth. Pearl noted she had a meeting with the Mayor, the Recreation Department and other city officials to discuss Recreation Department's CPC application projects. Pearl noted to the meeting attendees that she could not speak or make decisions on behalf of the CPC Committee. Pearl noted they presented five priority projects — Camp Paradise, Ellis Square, bath house at Dane Street, bath house at Lynch Park, and the spray park at Lynch Park. Pearl explained the Mayor presented a spreadsheet showing the bonding costs of the projects and asked if the CPC would consider bonding these projects. Pearl noted to the Mayor these projects would have to be approved individually and not as one project. Pearl asked if the Mayor could prioritize their projects even more and the Mayor noted the Camp Paradise project would be the high priority since he believes the land will not be available come this fall. There was a discussion among the Committee if this meeting was appropriate. It was generally agreed it was not appropriate. Pearl noted she would not attend such a meeting again if contacted. Pearl welcomes Daneille Povey of First Parish Chruch who had a few questions of the Committee: 1) does my project have to follow state procurement laws? The Committee was uncertain and will look into the answer. Maxner will post the answer on the CPC website once she finds out from the Coalition. 2) The church is listed on the State website as historical significant but she is unsure if there is City process to determine historical significance? The Committee noted that was part of the pre - application process and the First Baptist church is all set. 3) Instead of binder clips can we use binders because she is concerned the application materials will fall out? The Committee said no binders but you can put the application materials into large envelopes. The draft March 20, 2014 minutes are reviewed. Members suggest minor edits and clarifications. McCrory noted for the record the reference in the meeting minutes which notes the City Council has the ability to direct the CPC to choose projects is not correct, the City Council does not have that power. Williams moves to approve the minutes as amended. Seconded by McDonough. The motion carries with all members in favor. Pearl noted she forgot to coordinate with BEVCAM and it is still on the table and asks who on the Committee would like to attend. McCrory, Thomson, and Pearl note they are all willing to participate. Pearl also noted BEVCAM will provide draft questions for the interview. Adjournment McDonough moved to adjourn the meeting. Williams seconded. The motions carries will all members in favor. Meeting adjourned at 8:35 P.M. Community Preservation Committee 04 -17 -14 Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3