Loading...
1998-02-24BEVERLY CONSERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MEETING FEBRUARY 24, 1998 A regular meeting of the Beverly Conservation Commission was held on February 24, 1998 at 7:00 p.m., third floor, City Hall, 191 Cabot Street. Those Present were: Chairman David Lang, Vice-Chairman Tony Paluzzi, Dr. Mayo Johnson, Jon Mazuy, Jay Donnelly, Patricia Grimes and Richard Benevento. Also present was Assistant Planning Director Debbie Hurlburt and Susan Akerman, Secretary to the Commission. Meeting called to order by Chairman Lang at 7:00 p.m. Request for Determination of Applicabilities: Continuation: Hale Street (Mullen/Loeb Estate) delineation determination/James Mullen Debbie Hurlburt explained to the members that a letter request has been received from Hayes Engineering with respect to their clients agreement to grant an extension to the March 17, 1998 meeting. Debbie Hurlburt indicated that Hayes will relocate some of the flagged areas to where the Conservation Commission believes the resource area is; that some members will need to revisit the site to recheck the flaggings. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Tony Paluzzi to continue the hearing for the Mullen/Loeb Estate at Hale Street to the Commission's next meeting scheduled for March 17, 1998, pending a site visit scheduled for March 14, 1998 at 8:30 a.m., seconded by Pat Grimes and approved unanimously. Continuation: 940-942 Hale Street Chairman Lang explained to the members that there are some questions whether City sewerage is available for this proposed development so a perpetual extension is needed until the City Solicitor can determine if the applicant can hook-up to the sewer line. A motion was made by Tony Paluzzi to grant a perpetual extension for the hearing at 940-942 Hale Street until this is resolved and can be back before the Commission, seconded by Dr. Johnson and approved unanimously. Continuation: Route 128/Vegetation aPDlication/Mass HiqhwaV Steve Chandler addressed the Commission on behalf of Mass Highway and stated that they are seeking BVW identification in order to institute a vegetation management program along the highway, and that the purpose of the project is to reduce mechanical weed whacking. Mr. Chandler explained that they need to secure an agreement as to where the BVW lines are so that they can place indicator markers revealing the areas that can be sprayed and the areas that cannot be sprayed. Mr. Chandler stated that they submitted better infrared photos that will help in identifying where and what type of wetlands there are, have them confirmed, and then transfer onto delineation maps. Mr. Chandler explained that they are asking the City agent or group to go with them at the time of marking the delineation areas (spray/no spray), so that both parties are in agreement of where Mass Highway places the flags. Mr. Chanlder explained that the marked flaggings indicates to the person in charge of spraying how and when to spray: if 10' of a BVW - no spray; if 10'-100' Of a BVW - alternate years; if 100' away from buffer zone - annual spraying. Chairman Lang asked if a wetland is not identified on the infrared map, how are you going to know if it's a wetland. Mr. Chandler explained that DPW has project plans of previous work done that we can look at to help us identify wetlands. Jon Mazuy joins the meeting at this time. (7:20 p.m.) Debbie Hurlburt questioned Mass Highways request for a Determination of Applicability at this time, without the agreement of the flagged areas. Chairman Lang stated that the Commission also wants to know what types of pesticides are going to be used. Mr. Chandler explained that the process is to get a Negative Determination, then put together the Yearly Operation Procedure manual, place it out to bid, grant the bid by early March, get a certification of what chemicals are to be used, then once the delineation is agreed, a copy of the VMP goes to the DFA for review, then they submit this package to the Beverly Board of Health and Conservation Commission for review and comment, then after the plan is acceptable to all parties, the process will start in June, and will be done within a 21-day period. Jay Donnelly asked now do you plan to get the Commission's agreement with respect to the delineation of the wetlands. Mr. Chandler stated that the Commission could either accept the map drawn up from the infrared shots, or agree to go on land to walk the area. Chairman Lang recalled that the last time a process like this was done, the chemical Round-Up was used, and asked if Round-Up was going to be used this time. Mr. Chandler stated that the last time Round-Up was used, but that he is not sure what is going to be used this time. Chairman Lang stated that he is concerned if the chemical Round-Up is used because it is a very strong chemical to be used because there are more sensitive areas than others, and because there are a lot of wells in that area. Chairman Lang further stated that he prefers that Round-Up is not used, and asked if the Commission doesn't like Mass Highway's recommendation as to what chemicals are going to be used, what can be done. Bob Boone explained that the Conservation Commission can make their recommendation/comment to the DFA (Department of Food & Agriculture), that they can't do anything without approval, and stated that we will be aware of any known wells. Chairman Lang noted that there are no public supply wells. Bob Boone explained that they will know of private wells too. Tony Paluzzi asked if all these zones are marked out on the map. Mr. Chandler explained that all zones will be on the autocad sheet. Tony Paluzzi asked if the autocad sheets will be available when the Commission walks the site. Mr. Chandler stated not completed ones. Bob Boone explained that they have not yet received any comments from the Board of Health with respect to private wells or Zone 2 areas. Tony Paluzzi asked how long it will take to flag the areas. Bob Boone stated a day or less. Mr. Chandler explained that it won't be the entire road, just guardrail 1. Jay Donnelly asked if the only areas to be sprayed are going to be the guardrail and fill. Mr. Chandler stated not necessarily, there could be a couple more places. Chairman Lang asked if any member of the public wished to speak. There were none. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Pat Grimes to grant a Negative Determination of Applicability #3, pending a site walk with the Conservation Commission or their representative and Mass Highway to agree on the delineation of the BVW's, and that they use a water soluble pesticide in sensitive areas, seconded by Jay Donnelly. Motion carries 4-2. (Chairman Lang & Jon Mazuy opposed) 3 A motion was made by Tony Paluzzi to adjourn to the City Council Chambers, seconded by Pat Grimes and approved unanimously. New: 218 Hart Street/delineation determination/Christopher Welles Mike DeRosa of DeRosa Environmental addressed the Commission on behalf of the applicant Christopher Welles, reviewed the delineation map, and explained that the applicant is seeking a determination/confirmation of the delineation of the resource area that currently exists on the site. Mr. DeRosa further explained that the purpose of the determination/ confirmation of the delineation of the resource area is because the applicant is seeking to restore a former fresh water pond as an open water body. Mr. DeRosa noted that the proposed project would fall under a Notice of Intent, but continued to explain that the applicant wants to restore the fresh water pond back to its pre-existing conditions and enhance the existing vegetation. Mr. DeRosa stated that they want to get the Conservation Commission involved, and get an opinion with respect to the concept, then make a decision whether or not to invest funds into the next phase. Mr. DeRosa reviewed the present site and noted that the house sets back from the road, that there is an intermittent stream on the property, and that a portion of the wetlands are near the pond and is heavily silted. Mr. DeRosa stated that the U.S.G.S. shows that the former pond conforms to the configuration submitted, and that the applicant wants to restore the pond to its original contours. Mr. DeRosa further explained that the applicant wants to redesign a weir section that would keep the elevation the same, but that would need to be dredged, and stockpiling of material would also be needed on site. Mr. DeRosa reviewed what the proposed project would entail, and stated that the applicant will restore the silted-in pond to an open water body, enhance the greenery/shrubbery (planting will be indigenous types), and excavate the pond out to a depth of 8-10' with shelves around the pond to prevent growth of the same greenery, then the applicant will fill with water, get a quality certificate and have it inspected by the Army Corps. Jay Donnelly asked what caused the sedimentation. Mr. DeRosa explained that it was an excavated pond to begin with, and that there is a wet meadow up stream that caused leafs and twigs to build up over the years. 4 Jay Donnelly asked how the applicant plans to slow down the sedimentation process. Mr. DeRosa explained that they plan to deepen the contours of the pond, so it is less likely to settle in, and thus get a better quality of water in there. Jay Donnelly asked if there would be any changes to the out flow structure. Mr. DeRosa explained that they are trying to keep the out flow structure the same. Jon Mazuy asked how deep the pond was originally. Mr. DeRosa stated that he wasn't sure, but that they plan to restore it to a depth of 8-10' Chairman Lang asked how large the area will end up. Mr. DeRosa responded 20,000 square feet on a 1-20 scale plan. Chairman Lang stated that he is concerned with the residents that live down stream and asked how they plan to keep the water from flooding down stream. Mr. DeRosa explained that they intend to increase storage and control the water flowing down stream. Mr. DeRosa stated that they want to help the flooding situation or at least not make it worse. Jon Mazuy asked if they thought the flooding could be controlled. Mr. DeRosa stated yes, because they plan to create a deeper open body that would mean more storage, and they plan to have a substantial weir section. Jon Mazuy asked if there would be any impact up-stream. Mr. DeRosa stated that there shouldn't be any, that they plan to keep all work within Beverly city limits. Chairman Lang asked if any member of the public wished to speak. Rene Mary of 274 Hale Street stated that the intermittent stream referred to is part of a perennial brook (Chubbs Brook). There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Tony Paluzzi to continue discussion on this matter to the Commission's next meeting scheduled for March 17, 1998, pending a site visit on Saturday, March 14, 1998 at 10:00 a.m., seconded by Pat Grimes and approved unanimously. A motion was made by Jon Mazuy to recess for the purpose Of holding public hearings, seconded by Dr. Johnson and approved unanimously. Notice of Intents: Continuation: Company L.P. Henderson Road/mini-storaqe facility/T Ford Debbie Hurlburt explained to the members that a letter request was received from the applicant requesting an extension of the Public Hearing to the Commission's March 17, 1998 meeting, due to the fact that the applicant needs to confer with DEP regarding the samples found and find out what is required for remediation. A motion was made by Jon Mazuy to continue the Public Hearing on L.P. Henderson Road to the Commission's next meeting scheduled for March 17, 1998, seconded by Tony Paluzzi and approved unanimously. Continuation: 886 Hale Street/stairway, wall, fountain, qazebo, landscaping/Erikson Julie Parrino of Hancock Environmental addressed the Commission, reviewed what the project is for, stated that a site visit was done, and submitted the cross-section requested by the Comm]~ssion. Ms. Parrino explained that the applicant plans to Dave sono tubes 8-10' in eepth, a balustrade wall 8' away from each other and pre- cast in cement. Ms. Parrino reviewed where there will be a simple wall, explained that the stream will be graded and that no vegetation will be removed. Ms. Parrino stated that the stream on the property appears to be intermittent, and that the small ponding area does have a small watershed. Tony Paluzzi stated that he went to the site on Saturday, that the site is fairly flat, and that a little fill will need to be put in to reinforce the beam. Tony Paluzzi stated that he is concerned with the slopes because there are big rocks right under the proposed wall and asked how the applicant plans to get the posts in 8' as proposed without disturbing the rocks. Ms. Parrino stated that she is not sure how much rock material will have to be removed, that they will work around the areas where the big rocks are. Jon Mazuy stated that he is concerned with how they intend to get through the rock, and asked if major excavation will have to be done. Pat Grimes added that she is concerned with how they will stabilize the posts due to these large rocks. Tony Paluzzi stated that he is concerned about how this work will affect the slope. Ms. Parrino stated that they don't want to disturb any soils. 6 Jon Mazuy asked if she could find out how they intend to do this. Ms. Parrino responded yes. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Tony Paluzzi to continue the Public Hearing on 886 Hale Street to the Commission's next meeting scheduled for March 17, 1998, seconded by Jon Mazuy and approved unanimously. Richard Benevento joins the meeting at this time. (8:10 p.m.) Continuation: Off Wentworth Drive (Thackery Way)/construction of 3 homes/OHC Trust Carl Balsey addressed the Commission and submitted wetland data sheets and a revised plan that includes the outstanding drainage issues. Mr. Balsey explained that the wetland water drains to a public water supply, and that the revised plan includes a proposal for the construction of pocket wetlands as well as the proposed deep sump catch basins. Mr. Balsey explained that the catch basins coupled with pocket wetlands will utilize 85% of the area so as not to disturb the impervious area. Mr. Balsey stated that a small drainage study was done for the proposed subdivision and that storm water management forms have been submitted. Pat Grimes noted that when reviewing the Best Management Practices, it doesn't mention constructed pocket wetlands as a practicable form of storm water management that complies with the Comaission's standards. Mr. Balsey stated that they went a little further by adding these pocket wetlands to the drainage swale. Pat Grimes asked if pocket wetlands are 65-80% effective. Mr. Balsey responded yes. Chairman Lang questioned the berm around it. Mr. Balsey explained that the berm will be on the low side of the pocket wetland so that it goes over the contours. Chairman Lang stated that pocket wetlands are designed to catch and retain sediment and questioned the maintenance of the catch basins. Mr. Balsey explained that pocket wetlands require maintenance o~ce every 10 years. Jon Mazuy asked if they intend to do anything with the pocket wetlands or just excavate them. Mr. Balsey stated that they plan only to excavate the pocket wetlands and let the species grow. Jon Mazuy asked what the volume of water would be coming into the pocket wetlands when there is severe rain. Mr. Balsey explained 7 that the total impervious area will be 5,100 cubic feet, and that the water quality will be 90% of storm events. Jon Mazuy stated that he is concerned with the amount of flow and volume of the pocket wetlands and asked how quickly will the pocket wetlands get filled up. Mr. Balsey stated within one good rain storm. Jon Mazuy asked if the pocket wetlands will be big enough. Mr. Balsey stated that they will be big enough and adequate enough for practicable water management, a little less than the 10 year storm. Albert Ellis addressed the Commission on behalf of OHC Trust and stated that it will be a controlled area. Richard Benevento asked why they used the 10 year design period and not the 100 year storm event. Mr. Balsey explained that they went by the new Storm Water Rules & Regulations Policy, and then reviewed the roadway drainage system. Richard Benevento asked what the rate of run off will be from the surrounding houses and roadways. Mr. Balsey stated that they haven't made any provisions for the run-off rate because it is only a 4 lot subdivision, and stated that they went by the maximum extent practicable. Jay Donnelly asked how the drainage system will be designed to prevent erosion. Mr. Balsey explained that smaller broken rocks will be facing much larger rocks. Jay Donnelly noted that they would have to excavate quite a ways down in order to anchor the system, so it won't slide. Mr. Balsey responded that they probably would have to excavate quite a ways down. Tony Paluzzi asked how they plan to handle dewatering when excavating the foundations. Mr. Balsey stated that they don't expect to hit any water, and that Lot 2 is still above the elevation of the BVW. Tony Paluzzi asked if the footings are going to be below the cellar floor. Mr. Balsey explained that the footings will only be 4' down the cross section. Jon Mazuy questioned the fact that ground water won't be hit. Mr. Balsey explained that the foundations will be higher than the elevation of the wetlands. Mr. Ellis explained that what they have done in other instances if ground water is hit, is to stop the excavation process and pick-up the foundation. Tony Paluzzi asked if you do have to build-up, do you anticipate that a lot of grading will have to take place. Mr. Balsey explained that the foundations are already sitting up on a hill and that they will pick-up the foundations, not build-up. Chairman Lang asked if any member of the public wished to speak. There were none. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Jay Donnelly to close the hearing, seconded by Tony Paluzzi. Motion carries 5-2. (Richard Benevento and abstains) New: 10-12 Conqress Street/site restoration/Morton International Mr. Tindel addressed the Commission on behalf of Morton International and explained a proposal to remove existing concrete foundations that are approximately 6-8" of slab with a jack hammer that is already on site, remove the material, crush it, and use it as back-fill. Mr. Tindel stated that the crushing operation will be done outside the buffer zone, as far away from the resource area as possible, and that the concrete piles will be left on site until the material is processed and used as back-fill. Mr. Tindel explained that some equipment stands that were on slabs are still in place, and that they are proposing to chip them down and smooth them out. Mr. Tindel also stated that there are were left behind, and that Morton accordance with DEP guidelines. three monitoring wells that wants to abandon them in Jon Mazuy asked if all the material is concrete. Mr. Tindel responded yes. Chairman Lang asked once the concrete is removed, what will be underneath, and will it erode. Mr. Tindel explained that Morton is proposing to place top soil down and seed it, and explained that they are looking to extend the silt fencing for erosion control. Chairman Lang asked when the process will occur. Mr. Tindel stated when approval is granted. Tony Paluzzi asked if they intend to remove the slabs and the foundations. Mr. Tindel stated that they intend to take out the foundations. Richard Benevento asked if the back-filling operation has been done. Mr. Tindel responded yes. Richard Benevento asked if all this work will be done outside the back-filling operation. Mr. Tindel responded yes. Richard Benevento asked how long do you anticipate this work to go on. Mr. Tindel stated that there is a 4 week schedule planned. Chairman Lang asked if any member of the public wished to spaak. There were none. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Jon Mazuy to close the public hearing, seconded by Tony Paluzzi and approved unanimously. New: 54 Hillcrest Avenue/pool installation/Patrick Powell Susan and Patrick Powell addressed the Commission and explained a proposal to install a 15' x 15' above ground swimming pool in the back yard. Ms. Powell stated that the work will be done 15' from the edge of the resource area. Ms. Powell explained that the ground is fairly level and that no excavation will have to be done, and that haybales and silt fencing are proposed to protect the wetland area. Richard Benevento asked if they intend to dig. Ms. Powell responded yes. Richard Benevento asked if they intend to keep the grass around the pool. Ms. Powell responded yes. Tony Paluzzi stated that he did a site visit, that the site is relatively level, and as long as silt fencing and hay bales are in place he sees no problems. Tony Paluzzi asked the applicants how they intend to take out some of the sod and what will be done with the removed sod. Mr. Powell explained that they intend to hire a centractor to remove the sod and that they intend to take it off the site. Chairman Lang asked if any member of the public wished to speak. There were none. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Jon Mazuy to close the public hearing, seconded by Tony Paluzzi and approved unanimously. New: 21R Linden Avenue/additions/J. David Suminsby David Suminsby addressed the Commission and explained a proposal to construct an addition to his existing home. Mr. Suminsby explained that the proposed work is to be performed approximately 16' from the top of the slope of the embankment, and 50' from mean high water. 10 Mr. Suminsby stated that he intends to place haybales and silt fencing up to protect the river, that he plans to install gutters on the new roof areas and dry-well squares, that all additions except the chimney will be knocked out, that the deck will be constructed of permeable wood, that the covered porch will be roofed, and that the foundation will be concrete sono tubes. Mr. Suminsby explained that he intends to excavate below the proposed addition area because the entrance to the basement is directly under the new addition, and steps are needed to access into the cellar easier. Tony Paluzzi asked how much grading will need to be done for the lawn. Mr. Suminsby explained his plans for grading. Tony Paluzzi asked if he intends to have dry-wells for roof run- off. Mr. Suminsby responded yes, and pointed out on the plan where the gutters will be located. Richard Benevento asked how the roof runs off now. Mr. Suminsby explained that there are gutters up now. Richard Benevento asked if the down spouts run-off onto the soil. Mr. Suminsby responded yes. Tony Paluzzi asked if the driveway is to remain dirt. Mr. Suminsby stated that he has no plans to work on that. Chairman Lang asked if any member of the public wished to speak. There were none. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Jay Donnelly to close the pub]ic hearing, seconded by Tony Paluzzi and approved unanimously. New: Amendment: 63 Lothrop Street/construction of boathouse Julie ParriaO addressed the Commission and explained that the applicant is seeking an amendment to the original Order of Conditions for construction of a 10' x 20' boathouse, and for repairs to an existing seawall. Ms. Parrino explained that all the work is within a buffer zone and coastal bank. Ms. Parrino explained that the applicant is proposing to construct the boathouse with six sono tubes that are existing. Jon Mazuy asked why the applicant didn't come before the Commission with respect to the six sono tubes. Ms. Parrino stated that she knew they didn't, but doesn't know why. Ms. Parrino showed pictures of the site area. 11 Chairman Lang stated that some work has changed that was not part of the original Notice of Intent, and that the Commission will need to know why it was done before we can proceed. Jay Donnelly asked how the boats will be transferred from the boathouse to the ocean. Ms. Parrino stated that she was not quite sure. Richard Benevento asked if permits need to be applied for and acquired. Ms. Parrino stated no, and explained that there are no specific rules/regulations for construction activity of this nature. Chairman Lang questioned the flood way elevation. Ms. Parrino stated that the velocity zone is at 16. Jay Donnelly stated that he would like to see the cross-section with respect to the height and floor elevation. Richard Benevento asked if the applicant was requesting a modification and not a new filing. Ms. Parrino stated correct. Jay Donnelly also questioned why all this additional work was done outside the original filing. Tony Paluzzi questioned some trees that where taken down, and asked where they went. Ms. Parrino stated that she didn't know. Richard Benevento asked if a violation is involved. Chairman Lang stated yes. Richard Benevento stated that the Commission needs to inform the applicant that no additional work be done, and suggested that a cease and desist order be issued with the exception of stabilizing if necessary. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Richard Benevento to issue an Enforcement Order for the applicant to cease and desist all work at the site, unless in a case of stabilization, until the Conservation Commission has had the opportunity to visit the site, seconded by Tony Paluzzi and approved unanimously. A motion was made by Jon Mazuy to continue the public hearing to the Commission's next meeting scheduled for March 17, 1998 pending a site visit scheduled for Saturday, March 14, 1998 at 10:45 a.m., seconded by Tony Paluzzi and approved unanimously. 12 Old/New Business: 10 Foster's Point Scott Thomson addressed the Commission and explained that he is seeking a modification for work that he did to his house that exceeded the scope of the original size of the structure, but not the footprint. Richard Benevento asked how long this work has been going on. Mr. Thomson stated 1½ years. Richard Benevento asked if the additional work involved a bigger foundation. Mr. Thomson responded no, that the foundation was expanded earlier on, that it was already prepared for it. Mr. Thomson explained that he had numerous conversations with the Building Inspector, and that he didn't realize that he was creating a problem for himself. Richard Benevento asked if the plans were on file. Debbie Hurlburt stated yes. Richard Benevento stated that the plan should be revised, and a modification form be filled out to accurately show what has been done. Debbie Hurlburt stated that she's not sure if he has to take that route because the proposed footings already existed. Jon Mazuy stated that he feels it would be appropriate. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Jon Mazuy to approve the new plan, and to have the Administrator attach the Modification Form to the original filing, seconded by Tony Paluzzi and approved unanimously. 28 Hill Street Debbie Hurlburt updated the member and explained that she had a discussion with Val Miller of IT Corporation who is seeking a modification to the Order of Conditions for the site where a sump pump was installed for the discharge of treated water into a stream. Debbie Hurlburt stated that they are all set, doing all the work, and explained that they are now looking to drill in the street, approximately 75' away from the resource area, to put in a well to test the groundwater. Richard Benevento asked if it will be in the buffer zone. Hurlburt responded yes. 13 Chairman Lang suggested that they contain all the fluids in back of the truck and use a mud pan so there is no mess. Richard Benevento suggested that there be a condition that haybales are put up around any catch basins down stream. There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, a motion was made by Richard Benevento to find this request as a minor modification with the conditions that haybales are placed up at the nearest catch basins, that all fluids are contained within a mud pan, that there is to be no discharge to the catch basins, and in addition, to incorporate what's referenced in the letter, seconded by Tony Paluzzi and approved unanimously. A motion was made by Tony Paluzzi to approve the amendment, seconded by Jon Mazuy and approved unanimously. Order of Conditions Thackery Way ChairmanLang stated that the applicants have not demonstrated best practicable storm water management practices, and that he would like the applicant to submit a plan showing construction of the berm with stones of certain size. The Commission voted to issue (1) standard conditions for this project; and in addition (2) the applicant must submit a detailed set of plans showing the cross-sections for drainage and that the plans exhibits specific details with respect to the wetland pockets (ie: how built), specifically the slope for Lot 3 as to erosion prevention; (3) that there shall be no cement truck washout on site; (4) that the storage of all equipment be away from the resource area; and (5) that the applicant demonstrate that post development conditions will not alter the area subject to protection under the act, no one seconds, motion fails. A motion was made by Dr. Johnson to deny issuing an Order of Conditions, seconded by Jon Mazuy. Motion carries 5-1-1 (Chairman Lang, Grimes, Johnson, Mazuy and Paluzzi opposed, Donnelly in favor, Richard Benevento abstains). Chairman Lang stated that he is denying the proposal because the minimum was proposed regarding storm water management, and that water quality concerns where not to the extent of best practicable water quality management. 10-12 Conqress Street The Commission voted to issue (1) standard coastal conditions for this project; and in addition (2) the applicant must place top soil down and seed it; (3) that a vegetated mat be placed down after 14 seeding to prevent washout or to hydroseed; (4) that the seeding take place between April 15 through June 1, 1998; and (5) that all mechanical equipment be out of the buffer zone. A motion was made by Dr. Johnson to approve the Order of Conditions for 10-12 Congress Street as agreed, seconded by Tony Paluzzi and approved unanimously. 54 Hillcrest Avenue The Commission voted to issue (1) standard conditions for this project; and in addition (2) haybales and silt fencing are to be put up to protect the resource area; and (3) that the excavated sod be disposed/removed of properly. A motion was made by Jon Mazuy to approve the Order of Conditions for 54 Hillcrest Avenue as agreed, seconded by Tony Paluzzi and approved unanimously. 21R Linden Avenue The Commission voted to issue (1) standard and coastal conditions for this project; and in addition (2) that haybales and silt fencing be put up to protect the river; and (3) that all debris are to be picked up on a daily basis. A motion was made by Jon Mazuy to approve the Order of Conditions for 21R Linden Avenue as agreed, seconded by Tony Paluzzi and approved unanimously. Approval of Minutes: January 13, 1998 and February 3, 1998 A motion was made by Jon Mazuy to approve the minutes of the January 13, 1998 meeting, seconded by Dr. Johnson. Motion carries 6-1 (Richard Benevento abstains) A motion waa made by Tony Paluzzi to approve the minutes of the February 3, 1998 meeting, seconded by Jon Mazuy. Motion carries 5-2 (Richard Benevento and Jay Donnelly abstain) Old Business Debbie Hurlburt explained to the members that she received a bill from Hancock Environmental RE: Mullen/Loeb Estate, with the original bid proposal being $650.00 and an additional fee of $1,240.00 was billed for a little more work done in assisting the Conservation Commission with this project, which makes the total bill $1,890.00. Debbie stated that she thinks that the Commission needs to get an itemized breakdown from Hancock. 15 Adjournment A motion was made by Jon Mazuy to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Jay Donnelly and approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. 16