2011-08-30CITY OF BEVERLY
PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES
Date: August 30, 2011
Board: Conservation Commission
Members Present Chair David Lang, Tony Paluzzi, Dr. Mayo Johnson, Kate Glidden,
Mary Reilly
Members Absent: Katelyn Merrill, Bill Squibb
Others Present: Amy Maxner — Environmental Planner
Recorder: Eileen Sacco
Lang calls the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. at the Beverly City Hall, 191 Cabot Street, 3 rd Floor
City Council Chambers, Beverly, MA.
Certificate of Compliance
New: 1 Brookwood Road, DEP File #5 -725 — Brookwood School c/o Richard Chute
Maxner explains that the Commission has received a request for a Certificate of Compliance for an
outstanding Order of Conditions that has long expired but was never acted upon. She explains that
the Order governed dredging of the pond and the restoration of a bordering vegetated wetland. She
notes that the school reapplied for the project under a new Notice of Intent and recommends the
Commission vote to issue a Certificate of Compliance indicating this Order's expiration and non -
validity.
Paluzzi moved to issue a Certificate of Compliance. Glidden seconded the motion. The motion
carried 5 -0.
New: 1 Brookwood Road, DEP File #5 -914 — Brookwood School c/o Richard Chute
The Order governed dredging of the pond and associated Bordering Vegetated Wetland restoration.
She notes that the Commission had an opportunity to briefly observe pond conditions during its
recent site walk to the school for the synthetic turf field and she recently visited the site to do a
more focused inspection.
Maxner states that the as built plans do not indicate that the project was not constructed as planned.
She explains that the flared end section of the two 12 inch pipes with rip -rap discharging into the
pond were not constructed. She notes that she looked at this and there are no obvious signs of
erosion at the discharge point. She further notes that she did note some sediment deposits at the
discharge point.
Maxner states that the other item she observed is that the width of the driveway entrance has been
increased in size and the new pavement is closer to the intermittent stream on the other side of the
pond.
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 2 of 16
Reilly notes that a 20 foot buffer strip was to be installed around the pond but the area is mowed
lawn. She states that she would like to see this buffer strip established.
Maxner explains that the DeRosa report indicates that shelf plantings were installed as DeRosa
supervised the plant installation.
Johnson states that he feels that the Certificate of Compliance should not be issued until the work is
completed to the satisfaction of the Commission.
Lang agrees and states that he would like to see verification of the vegetative shelf and questions
why the width of the driveway was changed. He also notes that the as built plan shows open water
to the edge of the BVW. Lang states that this should be clarified on the plan. He also questions if
the work in the area of B20 -B35 was done.
Lang suggests that the Commission continue this matter to the September 13, 2011 meeting, for
more information to be submitted regarding the concerns of the Commission.
Paluzzi moves to continue this matter to September 13, 2011. Johnson seconds the motion. The
motion carries 5 -0.
New: 9 Cole Street, DEP File # 5 -963 — Adriano Taugino
Jessie Blanchette from Griffin Engineering is present for the applicant.
Maxner explains that the Order governed work on an existing single family house and lot including
rear porch and deck construction, driveway re- grading and resurfacing, retaining wall construction,
patio and walkway installation and landscaping within the 100 -Foot Buffer Zone to Bordering
Vegetated Wetland.
Blanchette explains that the changes to the plan. One change resulted in a reduction of the
impervious surface of the driveway by 300 s.f and a catch basin was omitted as pea stone was
installed instead of asphalt.
Maxner explains the following special conditions that were part of the Order:
➢ Special Conditions #2, 3 & 8 are obsolete as the catch basin was not installed and
the vegetable garden has been eliminated. The proposed driveway was shrunk is
size and the surface is pea stone and cobblestone.
➢ Special Condition #4 required plantings — three gold mop cypresses and four
high bush blueberry bushes were planted along the edge of the wetland, she notes
that plantings were done along the edge of wetland within mowed lawn area.
➢ Special Conditions # 9 & 10 are obsolete as the as built conditions do not allow
for any vehicles or construction equipment to be brought down to the rear yard;
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 3 of 16
and the owner is in the midst of selling the house, so his masonry business will
go with him.
➢ Special Conditions # 6 & 7 were complied with.
She notes that Special Condition # 1 required removal the retaining wall because it is in the 25 foot
NDZ. She notes that this was not done. She notes that she visited the site and shows the
Commission photos of the area, noting the outstanding issue of the retaining wall and the
unauthorized addition of a blue stone patio area with a barbeque grill in the No Disturb Zone, which
was not on the original plan.
Lang suggests that the Commission could issue the Certificate of Compliance contingent on the
removal of the stone retaining wall as required in special condition #1 of the Order of Conditions.
Blanchette states that removing the wall is not practical at this point and would be a logistical
nightmare and would probably result in greater disturbance. Reilly suggests that the applicant
should come up with a mitigation plan to compensate for the retaining wall and unauthorized patio.
Blanchette states that they would be willing to do that and suggests a 1 -1 ratio.
Paluzzi moves to continue the matter to September 13, 2011. Johnson seconded the motion. The
motion carries 5 -0.
New: 1 Bathing Beach Lane, DEP File #5 -1020 — Donald & Judith Morse
Fred Geisel, professional engineer for the project, is present for the applicant.
Maxner explains that the Order governed demolition of existing cottage structure and reconstruct
30' x 30' dwelling and 10'x 30' covered porch, installation of two Stormtech infiltration chambers
to receive and infiltrate roof runoff She notes that two large pine trees were removed to
accommodate the new dwelling footprint and work took place within 200 Foot Riverfront Area to
the Bass River and 100 -Foot Buffer Zone to Coastal Bank and Coastal Beach.
Geisel notes that the building was constructed and was about two - tenths of a foot further from the
wetland than the approved plan. He explains that the original plan was for a covered porch but they
build an open deck instead as that allowed for better views of the river. He also notes that they
installed one infiltration device, explaining that this one device, the installation of which he
personally supervised, will infiltrate the decreased roof surface. He also notes that there was no
erosion after recent heavy rains and everything seems to be working fine.
Maxner states that she visited the site and the site is stable, noting that the Morse's came back to the
Commission for a modification to build a small retaining wall at the edge of the house and parking
area, and this area is complete and stable.
There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter. Paluzzi moves to issue a
Certificate of Compliance. Glidden seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 -0. Maxner thanks
Geisel for attending the meeting.
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 4 of 16
Maxner also notes that there are three large white pine trees that the applicant is requesting to
remove from the site. She explains that two of them are next to the newly constructed house and
the third is along the northerly property boundary next to the neighbor's house. She provides
photos of the trees for their review.
Lang states that when the lower branches of White Pines die off the trees tend to get top heavy and
topple.Reilly states that it seems reasonable that the trees be removed.
Glidden moves to approve the removal of three white pines in the locations specified. Johnson
seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
New: 675R Hale Street, DEP File #5 -887 — James Seamans
Maxner explains that the Order governed repair of an existing drainpipe with wooden anchor
supports, within Coastal Beach and Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage. She notes that the
engineer provided a statement and some photos of pre and post construction for the Commission to
review.
Maxner explains that the only deviation from the plan was that wooden anchors were proposed and
they were switched with galvanized bands. She notes that she visited the site and everything else
seems to be in compliance as the area is completely covered with sand at this point.
There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, Johnson moves to issue a
Certificate of Compliance. Paluzzi seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
Request for Determination of Applicability
Cont: 10 Eleanor Avenue — Construct retaining wall and install fence — Joan M. Gallagher
Maxner reports that the applicant has requested that the matter be continued to the next meeting of
the Commission on September 13, 2011.
Johnson moves to continue. Paluzzi seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
New: 38 Standley Street — Waring School
Maxner reads legal notice.
Bill Manuell is present for the applicant.
Manuell addresses the Commission and explains that the proposal entails vegetation management
along a stretch of Standley Street that abuts the school property in the vicinity of the Headmaster's
house. He states that they want to remove vines that have overgrown and obscured the stonewall
running parallel with the street, and selectively remove shrubs and invasive vines on a forested
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 5 of 16
knoll in a 300 -500 s.f area. He notes that the work is to take place within the outer 100 feet of the
Riverfront Area to the stream that exits out of the Beverly Compost facility. He states that the
impact of this work to the site will be less than 1 %.
Lang asks if they are proposing a maintenance program. Manuell states that the work should hold
up for a couple of years and at that time they may be back for additional maintenance work on the
site.
Maxner states that she visited the site and measured the edge of the BVW and she is comfortable
with the measurements. She also notes that they will be cutting some Norway Maple saplings on
the knoll site.
Lang opens to public comment at this time. There is no one present who wishes to comment on this
matter.
There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, Paluzzi moves to issue a
Negative # 2 and # 3 Determination. Johnson seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
Recess for Public Hearings
Paluzzi moves to recess for public hearings. Reilly seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
Cont: 17 Bailey Avenue — Louise Pommershiem — DEP File #5- 1060
Jesse Blanchette is present for the applicant. Also present is Attorney Steven Lovely for the
neighbors.
Lang recuses himself from discussion of this matter and leaves the room.
Blanchette addresses the Commission and explains that the applicant is proposing to demolish the
existing single - family house and build a new one with associated driveway, utilities and
landscaping within the 100 -Foot Buffer Zone to Coastal Bank and the 200 -Foot Riverfront Area to
the Danvers River. He notes that a site visit was conducted on Thursday August 4 at which time
the Commission offered their thoughts on driveway treatment and plantings. He notes that he has
submitted revised plans as a result of the suggestions made by the Commission.
Blanchette explains that the revisions to the plans are minor and notes that the driveway surface has
been changed from bituminous paving to pervious pavers which will reduce the pervious surface on
the site by 46 %.
Blanchette also reports that they have enlarged the planting area noting that they will transplant
some perennials and have added more shrubs to the landscaping plan. He also notes that they are
saving a maple tree between their property and Bresnehan and they will be removing a diseased
pine tree. He notes that the maple tree will need to be limbed due to the second story interference.
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 6 of 16
Maxner questions how big the gravel is beneath the pervious pavers. Blanchette states that they are
proposing 3 /4 inch crushed stone.
Paluzzi asks Blanchette to review the planting plan with the Commission.
Maxner asks if the roof runoff will be infiltrated on the site. Blanchette states that it will be.
Maxner asks if the project requires ZBA approvals. Blanchette states that to his knowledge no
approvals are required from the ZBA.
Paluzzi opens the hearing up for public comment at this time.
Attorney Steven Lovely addresses the Commission and requested a copy of the revised plans to
review with the neighbors. He also requests that the Commission recess this portion of the hearing
to allow the neighbors to review the plan.
Johnson moves to recess the public hearing at this time to allow the neighbors to review the revised
plans. Glidden seconds the motion. The motion carries 4 -0.
The Commission moved on to the next agenda item at this time.
Cont: 1 Brookwood Road — DEP File #5 -1061- Brookwood School c/o Richard Chute
Lang returns to the meeting at this time.
Nathan Collins senior project manager from Gale Associates is present for the applicant.
Collins addresses the Commission and explains the basic intent of the application, noting that a site
visit was held on Thursday August 4 th at which time the Commission observed site conditions and
reviewed the plan. He also notes that the Commission requested additional information regarding
testing information on the leachate and runoff from synthetic fields, which has been provided. He
also notes that DEP has provided comments and notes in particular that DEP did not consider the
existing managed natural turf field as a degraded Riverfront or redevelopment and stated that 2:1
mitigation is required for work in Riverfront for new development. He notes that Gale has provided
a revised landscaping and mitigation plan to address DEP's suggestions.
Collins reviews the landscaping and mitigation plan with the Commission. He notes there are three
elements to the mitigation plan. The first being landscaping improvements in two areas on the site.
The first is around the existing pond which aims to maintain the waters edge and install landscaping
and spread a conservation seed mix area at a minimum of 10 feet around the pond, in some places
about 30 feet, and in another 10 foot swath they propose to install 100 new native plantings. The
second area of landscaping will consist of a minimum of 10 feet from the edged of the new turf field
and the bank of the brook with over100 native shrubs and install a netting system to protect the
resource area from errant balls and other activities.
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 7 of 16
Collins reports that the second element for mitigation is a proposed conservation restriction of over
on a significant portion of the school property of about 157,000 square feet and the third element is
that the school will continue to manage and control invasive species with an additional area of
40,000 square feet on campus. He notes that there is just over 109,000 square feet of disturbance
from the field in Riverfront and all of the mitigation proposed adds up to about 212,000 square feet
between the landscaping, conservation restriction and invasive specie management, just over a 2:1
ratio.
Johson asks for a clarification relative to the 157,000 square foot figure. Collins explains that the
conservation restriction is just over 157,000 square feet in area of protected land.
Lang asks what the square footage for invasive specie management is. Collins explains that it is
just over 40,000 square feet. Lang asks if the invasive specie management effort will be carried on
in perpetuity. Collins notes that it is a continuing effort on the schools part that has been part of
their operations. He notes that the entrance to the school will be cared for as they don't want plants
to be running wild and taking over.
Reilly asks how much of the land to be placed in the conservation restriction consists of wetland
resource area. Collins states that he does not know how much land is wetland off hand, but notes
that some of it is resource area. Reilly asks about the area around the area of the pond that was part
of the pond dredging which called for a native planted strip and notes that this should be reconciled
with the new mitigation under this application. Collins will review that, since they were not
involved with that original dredging project and will see if it impacts the mitigation calculations.
Lang asks how many of water quality samples reviewed were from similar fields installed in
Massachusetts, noting that one was installed in Wayland, but also results from the Microsoft
campus in Washington state. Collins states that he thought they were all from MA, noting that Gale
conducted the testing for Wayland, and McLoan and Broom based out of CT tested on CT fields.
He notes that there was testing in Lancaster, MA too. Lang notes that the results for zinc and
copper readings gave him concern. Collins notes that some results for zinc were above the readable
level some reading at .0475 mg/L and as much as 1.75 mg/L, noting that the drinking water quality
standards published in July 2011 allow for a level of 5 mg/L. Lang states that he is concerned about
the EPA national ambient freshwater criteria, noting that the standard is 120 micrograms or
.12mg /L. He notes that LSP's use that as criteria for surface water concentrations across MA, and
certainly we don't want to exceed of those levels. Lang notes that this is a significant issue and he
would like for additional clarification to be submitted about this. He states that he would imagine
that manufacturers would take precautions on this, but would like additional information in regard
to EPA national ambient water quality standards.
Collins states they have received a letter from DEP establishing a Beneficial Use Determination for
use of recycled tires and he can provide that too.
Johnson states that he read the water quality information, and the runoff that were submitted noting
they were only for the first couple of years from installation and, knowing that these fields need to
be replaced after 10 or 12 years, he would like to see the results for a period of 6 to 7 years after the
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 8 of 16
fields are installed to get a better understanding of the impacts over a longer period in the life of the
field.
Collins states that the crumb rubber manufacturers have informed them that the highest
concentrations of any of these materials would be at the time of installation when the rubber is
dirtiest, so to speak. A lot of the testing required were based on that first year and based on those
results they were allowed to eliminate the testing. He notes that Newton High School did water
evaluation testing as their conservation permits. Lang asks when Wayland's field was constructed.
Collins estimates around 2007.
Maxner questions who established the criteria for the testing in Wayland. Collins explains that the
Conservation Commission established the testing timings and criteria, and Wayland contracted with
Norfolk Ram Group and he was not sure what standards were used.
Lang opens the hearing up for public comment at this time. There is no one present who wishes to
comment on this matter.
Lang states that he would like to see additional information regarding testing and the ambient water
quality criteria. He also states that he would like to see data on zinc, copper or metals testing that
may have been done in other communities. Collins notes that Gale has worked with Needham,
Newton, Wayland, Winchester and Melrose are some of the towns that Gale worked with. Collins
asks if there are any other questions that Gale can address.
Paluzzi asks to look at the sample that they brought. Collins passes out the materials mix of sand
30% and rubber 70 %Collins notes they specify cryogenic rubber that is a cleaner product and has a
different specific gravity to prevent it from floating which is important near wetland resources.
Maxner asks the ratio of sand to rubber. Collins notes it is usually 40% sand to 60% rubber, and
with a 2' /z inch piling there will be 6 pounds of infill per square foot. Members review the samples.
Paluzzi asks how high the netting system will be. Collins notes that it will be 6 feet on the brook
side and 10 feet on the pond side.
Collins states he will email Maxner a list of agents from the various Commissions they have worked
with. Lang asks for the BUD information. Maxner asks for a final list of what supplemental
information the Commission is asking for.
Lang states any data on testing results for zinc, copper and other metals based on EPA national
ambient water quality criteria, contacts of other Commissions that may have their own sampling
data, and the DEP BUD letter. Maxner remind Collins to reevaluate the planting strip around the
pond per the previous Order of Conditions for pond dredging, and verify the percentage of wetland
resource area in the conservation restriction area.
There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, Paluzzi moves to continue the
public hearing to September 13, 2011. Reilly seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 9 of 16
Resume Public Hearing: 17 Bailey Avenue — Louise Pommershiem — DEP File #5- 1060
Lang recuses himself from discussion of this matter.
Lovely addressed the Commission and reports that the neighbors have reviewed the plans and they
have a couple of small requests of the applicant. He explains that they are requesting that the maple
tree that is proposed to remain on the property be removed, as the proposed project will block the
neighbors view. He also requests that the Order of Conditions require that the maintenance of the
pipe be the responsibility of the owner.
Reilly suggests that a replacement tree should be planted elsewhere on the site to mitigate for the
removal of the tree. Maxner suggests that the location of the new tree should be in a location that is
mutually agreeable to both parties.
There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, Reilly moves to close the
public hearing. Glidden seconds the motion. The motion carries 4 -0.
Lang returns to the meeting at this time.
New: Orchard Street, Lawrence Street Brook Cleaning — City of Beverly
Maxner reads legal notice.
Mike Collins, Commissioner of DPS and Engineering, is present at the meeting for the City of
Beverly
Collins addresses the Commission and explains that there is a small section of Lawrence Street
Brook that runs along Orchard Street where sediment and debris has accumulated in the channel at
the mouth of the culvert and is prohibiting flow. He also notes that the stream has experienced
neighborhood dumping of various materials over the years. He explains that this mound of
sediment will be removed to allow flow under small storm events and normal low flow conditions
to be reestablished. He explains that with the Lawrence Street brook drainage improvements, a 3' x
5' relief culvert was installed within Orchard Street at the juncture where the brook daylights at
Bisson and Orchard, and the mouth of the culvert contains a two - brick -high weir that only allows
flow in the culvert during larger precipitation events. He notes that at the very moment, the
accumulated sediment is prohibiting low flow from occurring in the stream and is going into the
culvert. He refers to the brook channel profile, noting that it seems dramatic due to the vertical
scale but the level of the sediment is not that extreme, it's only 8 /1Oths of a foot. He notes that the
course of 300 feet from Bisson Street to the driveway at 17 Orchard Street there will be minor
grading of the stream bottom. He notes that there is no delineation of the wetlands because they are
literally within the wetland for this work. Noting that they estimate removing about 12 cubic yards
of sediment. He notes that before this sediment built up and just after the drainage work, the system
was able to handle the Mother's Day storm event of 2006.
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 10 of 16
Lang asks when they propose to do the work. Collins explains that they want to do it as soon as
possible. Maxner asks if he aims to achieve the 1 -foot pitch. Collins states they will try to get that
same F pitch the best they can.
Reilly asks if the work will be done in the dry. Collins states they can diver 100% of the water flow
at the culvert intersection with a couple sandbags.
Lang opens the hearing up for public comment at this time.
Ellen Miller of 5 Orchard Street addresses the Commission and states she is confused about the
slight regarding of the stream along Orchard Street and asks how a minor regarding will reestablish
flow in the stream. Collins notes that water takes the path of least resistance and therefore by
lowering the grade just that much can get the water to flow again, it is not complicated and really a
simple fix. Miller asks if this will help with the mosquitoes. Collins notes that the mosquitoes will
still be a problem regardless.
Resident of 97 Bisson Street addresses the Commission and states that she is an engineer, but had
the same concerns of Ms. Miller and it took her some looking at this remedy to finally agree and
feels that Collins is on the right track with the proposed work.
Collins states that that the City's winter deicing practices have changed for the better, no sand is
used for road treatment during the winter months and street sweeping and catch basins cleaning is
done more regularly, which should prove to decrease that source of sand and sediment into these
systems City wide.
John Minigan of 98 Hale Street addresses the Commission and states that he is concerned about the
limited amount of work and thinks that the City needs to do much more extensive cleaning of the
brook and repair areas of his stone wall along the brook. He also notes that the stonewall is caving
in and the bottom is littered with stones.
Collins notes that the neighbors in the area have been very cooperative throughout this process
especially considering that none of the stream channel or its banks are on City owned property and
permission to work on private property was necessary. He notes that the main goal of this project is
to restore the low flows and they will only be doing as much as it takes to achieve that goal. The
City does not intend to repair private retaining walls.
Lang asks what type of equipment will be used. Collins expects that all is needed will be a small 4-
foot wide rubber tracked excavator shall be used within the stream channel and does not expect any
impact to the side slopes or banks of the stream.
Reilly notes that any impacts to the slopes or banks should be returned to their original condition.
There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, Paluzzi moves to close the
public hearing. Glidden seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
New: L.P. Henderson Road /Sam Fonzo Drive, Parcel A — Cicoria Tree & Crane Service, Inc.
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 11 of 16
Maxner reads legal notice.
John Morin from Neve Morin Group is present and Mark Cicoria, the applicant, is also present.
Morin addresses the Commission and explains that the proposal involves the construction of a
contractor's building, attached office, paved parking and gravel access road, stockpile area and
installation of stormwater management facilities to support Cicoria Tree service business. He notes
that the work is to take place within the 100 -Foot Buffer Zone to a BVW.
He explains that the lot was created from a larger lot owned by the City of Beverly and explains the
location. He reviews the plans and notes that the subject parcel is 2.3 acres. He explains that a
majority of the site is wooded with an intermittent stream and associated bordering vegetated
wetland along L.P. Henderson Road and the wetland edge coincides with the tow of slope. He also
explains that there is an existing gravel driveway to access utilities and they are proposing access
into the site over that drive by an easement agreement with the City. He notes that they are
proposing a pervious surface for the parking area in a portion of the buffer zone. He also explains
that they have filed for Site Plan and Special Permit with the Planning Board for their September
13 meeting.
Morin explains that they will be stockpiling logs and wood chips and similar materials, but there
will be no chipping on the site and not cutting of trees. He notes that the stockpile areas will be
contained with shea block retaining wall and will be about 6 feet high and periodically emptied. He
explains that the snow storage areas for the site are outside of the buffer zone and notes the
locations on the plans. He goes on to explain the proposed stormwater management system noting
that the main component for water quality treatment is the grass swale that discharges to a terminal
infiltration basin and outlet structure. He explains the route that the stormwater will take through
the system.
Moring states that the plan has been modified slightly to include a proposed utility pole for
overhead utilities. He also notes that underground utilities will be installed on a portion of the site.
Lang asks if there will be a compost area on the site and whether woodchips will be properly
contained to prevent runoff from the chips from entering the wetland system. Morin states that
there will be no composting on the site and the chips and logs will be stored in a contained area
outside the buffer zone, noting that storage of such materials will have a very discrete place on site.
Maxner reports that Mr. Cicoria started removing trees on the site a couple of weeks ago and the job
was shut down by the City Solicitor.
Paluzzi asks if the snow storage area is to be used for snow removed from other locations. Morin
states that the snow storage areas are for snow plowed on site, not imported from other sites.
Lang suggests that the Commission visit the site. Members agree. The Commission scheduled a
site visit for Monday, September 12, 2011 at 5:30 p.m.
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 12 of 16
Lang opens the hearing up for public comment at this time. There is no one present who wishes to
comment on the matter.
There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, Paluzzi moves to continue the
public hearing to September 13, 2011, pending a site visit on September 12, 2011. Reilly seconds
the motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
New: 43 L.P. Henderson Road — City of Beverly Emergency Management Agency
Maxner reads legal notice.
Bill Manuell of Wetlands & Land Mangement is present for the applicant.
Manuell addresses the Commission and explains that the proposal involves constructing a new steel
frame building on a concrete slab on grade, utility and sewer connections within 100' BZ to an
intermittent stream and fringe BVW. Manuell states that they propose to comply with all
requirements for the No Disturb Zone except for a small portion that is in the utility trench zone,
which is currently a grassy area. This route was chosen because of the existing conduit that can be
reused instead of laying new piping.
He explains that the building will be constructed in the Northeast corner of the site. He notes that
the wetlands have been flagged and they plan to use standard construction techniques. He also
notes that they will install a filter sock between the edge of the limit of work and the wetland and
intermittent stream.
Manuell states that there is a series of catch basins existing on the site and briefly explains the
drainage. He notes that stormwater runoff from the new roof of the building will be captured by a
perimeter drain of crushed stone to ensure infiltration of roof runoff
Paluzzi questions if they are proposing any mitigation for the work proposed in the NDZ. Manuell
states that there is none shown on the plan, noting that it is a very small area and they will seed the
area to return it to its original condition. Reilly notes that she would like to see it reseeded with a
native wildflower mix.
Maxner questions how they will manage the excavated materials on the site. Manuell states that
they plan to backfill and remove the excess from the site.
Lang opens the hearing up for public comment at this time. There is no one present who wishes to
comment on the matter.
There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, Paluzzi moves to close the
public hearing. Johnson seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
New: 677 Hale Street — Peter & Joan Johnson
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 13 of 16
Maxner reads legal notice.
Bill Manuell of Wetlands & Land Management, Peter and Joan Johnson are present.
Manuell addresses the Commission and explains that the Johnson's have been experiencing
prolonged flooding in the back yard and sink holes that are associated with an old drainage system
that is beginning to deteriorate. He explains that the proposed work involves excavating the old
underground channel and possible remnant piping and replacing it with a new infiltration channel
including a Draintech catch basin. He also explains that they will be filling and repairing sinkholes
on the site and notes that the work will take place within 100' BZ to intermittent stream channel.
He explains the nature of the resources on site.
Manuell states that the extent of work will be approximately 65 feet long and 10 feet wide, which
should be sufficient to lay the trench and associated piping. He notes that he does not know at this
time how far down it will go. Discussion ensues about the proposed work. Maxner suggests that
the engineer should be on site during construction.
Lang opens the hearing up for public comment at this time. There is no one present who wishes to
comment on this matter.
There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, Paluzzi moves to close the
public hearing. Glidden seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
Abbreviated Notice of Resource Area Delineation
Cont: 64 & 66 Paine Avenue — John Godfrey
Peter Ogren of Hayes Engineering is present for the applicant.
Ogren addresses the Commission and explains that the applicant is asking the Commission to
review and affirm the delineation of what they believe to be an Isolated Vegetated Wetland only
regulated under the Beverly Wetlands Protection Ordinance.
Ogren notes that this area is an isolated depression and most members of the Commission have
visited the site. He explains the wetland line that they arrived at.
Lang states that he is satisfied that the wetland line as it is indicated on the plan and the
Commission's in -field investigation of the flags. Members agree.
Lang opens the hearing up for public comment at this time. Brit Hutchins explains that prior owner
recently upgraded his septic system and there has been some regarding of that area on the wetland
side of the system as well as a new barrier retaining wall, but out of the buffer zone, noting that any
sort of intermittent stream may have been stopped by the wall and grading. He asks if this
regarding and wall could impact the way water drains and asks for clarification as to the whether
that could have interrupted the natural flow. Lang states that it is possible as things change over
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 14 of 16
time. Ogren notes that this area consists of grassy lawn and does not have significant characteristics
of a wetland or a stream channel. Lang notes that there may have been a larger basin at one time,
but at this point in time it's sheet flow that moves in a downhill direction.
There being no further questions or comments regarding this matter, Johnson moves to close the
public hearing. Paluzzi seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
Orders of Conditions
Orchard Street Stream — City of Beverly
Discussion ensues as to possible conditions for the project. Paluzzi moves to issue Standard
Conditions and the following Special Conditions as discussed:
1. Impacts to the bank and side slopes of the stream shall be avoided and kept to a minimum to
the greatest extent possible. Any disturbance to the banks and side slopes shall be repaired
and reseeded with a native wildflower mix — see attached specification sheets for acceptable
seed mixes to be used. If the season is not conducive to seed growth, these areas shall be
protected with hay mulch or erosion control matting.
2. As described at the public hearing, only a small 4 -foot wide rubber tracked excavator shall
be used within the stream channel.
3. To the greatest extent possible only one entrance and exit point to and from the stream shall
be established. If additional access /exit points need to be used, the Conservation
Administrator shall review such areas in the field for approval.
4. An erosion control check dam, consisting of staked hay bales, shall be installed at the down
stream end of the excavation work.
5. The bank and side slopes shall not be mowed or cut as part of this project.
Johnson seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
43 LP Henderson Road — City of Beverly Emergency Management Agency
Discussion ensues as to possible conditions for the project. Glidden moves to issue Standard
Conditions and the following Special Conditions as discussed:
1. Any disturbance to the slope leading to the stream bank shall be restored with a native
wildflower seed mix (see specification sheet attached for acceptable mix).
Johnson seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
677 Hale Street — Peter & Joan Johnson
Discussion ensues as to possible conditions for the project. Paluzzi moves to issue Standard
Conditions and the following Special Conditions as discussed:
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 15 of 16
1. The Conservation Administrator shall be notified at least 48 hours prior to start of
excavation.
2. If any unusual or unexpected conditions are discovered the applicant shall notify the
Conservation Administrator so that a determination can be made as to whether additional
information is required for Commission review.
Reilly seconds the motion. The motion carried 5 -0.
17 Bailey Avenue — Louise Pommershiem — DEP File #5- 1060
Lang recused himself from discussion on this Order of Conditions. Discussion ensues as to possible
conditions for the project. Johnson moves to issue Standard Conditions and the following Special
Conditions as discussed:
1. As agreed to by the applicant during the August 30, 2011 hearing, as replacement for the
removal of the 26" maple tree and 30" pine tree, two (2) native maple trees at least 2 -inch in
caliper shall be planted on site in a location agreeable to both the applicant and abutters.
2. The existing grove of Solomon Seal located along the easterly side of the house shall be
preserved to the greatest extent possible and shall be replanted within the proposed riparian
planting area or elsewhere on site that ensures its survival.
3. The foundation drain shall be constructed of ductile iron pipe where there is anticipated
vehicle traffic within the Elizabeth Avenue right of way.
4. Maintenance and repair of the foundation drain shall be the applicant's /property owner's
responsibility. This condition shall survive in perpetuity beyond the issuance of a
Certificate of Compliance.
5. The proposed mitigation plantings, trees, and pervious paver driveway are not an option but
a requirement per 310 CMR 10.58 and must be completed as part of approval of this project.
6. The driveway shall remain constructed of pervious materials. This condition shall survive in
perpetuity beyond the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance.
Glidden seconds the motion. The motion carried 4 -0.
OLD/NEW BUSINESS
Lang returns to the meeting at this time.
Request of Endicott College to Remove Tree
Maxner explains that Dennis Monaco of Endicott College has requested approval to remove a Birch
Tree from the pond island. She explains that Dodge Tree Service has inspected the tree and
provided a report that found 1/3 of the crown is dead, noting that it is diseased. She notes that they
are proposing replacement of the tree and reads an email from Joe Orzel of Gulf of Maine as to
possible replacements. Discussion ensues regarding the type of tree to be replanted.
Beverly Conservation Commission
August 30, 2011 Meeting Minutes
Page 16 of 16
Paluzzi moves to approve the request of Endicott College to remove a Birch Tree from the pond
island and that it be replaced with a white cedar tree in the largest caliper available, with eastern
hemlock not being preferred considering the whooly adelgid problem. Johnson seconded the
motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
Request of the Beverly Planning Board for Comments on the Site Plan Review for Cicoria
Tree Service
Maxner states she will inform the Planning Board that the Commission has opened the public
hearing for the Notice of Intent filed with the Commission. Members discuss the permits required
with the Planning Department. Maxner states the project needs a site plan approval and special
permit for the watershed overlay district (WPOD). Members discuss fuel storage, equipment and
fleet refueling operations as well as chemical storage that will be conducted on site as part of the
business. Reilly notes that snow storage on site should be a consideration as well. Members agree
to authorize Maxner to write a comment letter to the Planning Board regarding these concerns as
they are regulated under the WPOD.
Approval of Minutes
No quorum of members was present to approve minutes this evening.
Adiournment
There being no further business to come before the Commission this evening, Reilly moves to
adjourn the meeting. Glidden seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 -0.
The meeting adjourns at 10:00 p.m.