Loading...
1998-04-01Nor~oods Pond Commission Tmg/Lampaf Do/d Lag V'~g/n/a McG/.~n .roj~e Mc~ra/tm B~ce MEETING MINUTES · APRIL 1, 1998 Members present: Chairman Don Martin, J. Michael Lawler, Neiland Douglas, Joyce McMahon, Bill Frost, Virginia McGlynn, David Lang, Todd Lampert, Keyin Burke, Tina Cassidy. Chairman Martin calls the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and asks if any members of the public present wish to make comments or ask questions. Ron Johnson displays a map of the Norwood Pond site which shows Norwood Pond, Wenham Lake, the Reservoir and an acquifer. Johnson explains that an acquifer indicates a connection to Norwood Pond, and explains that he believes that the acquifer goes back up to the Wenham Lake water supply. Johnson notes that any development of the Norwood Pond site that brought in pollutants would also affect Norwood Pond, and could be a potential problem. David Lang asks if the groundwater fav orability map shows ground water capabilities. Johnson responds yes. Douglas asks if there are wells that presently tap into the acquifer. -Lang states probably not, and explains that if there are wells in this area they are private wells not municipal, and that it would not be a favorable place for development of municipal water supplies. Renee Mary ~otes that there are two private wells in her area. Next, Martin asks members if they have reviewed the draft minutes of the March 4, 1998 meeting and whether there are any suggested corrections/additions. McMahon requests that the minutes state that she was unable to attend that meeting. McMahon: motion to accept the March 4, 1998 meeting minutes as amended, seconded by Lang. All members in favor, motion carries. Norwood Pond Commission April 1, 1998 Meeting Page Two Next, members get an update from Lang with respect to the mapping of City Property/Norwood Pond campus, and explains that he requested a mylar of the wetlands and the overlay river district, but that he didn't receive a good mylar. Lang explains that he shaded-in the pond area and the obvious wetlands, and that this should help the members get a feel for the area north of the highway. Douglas asks if all the vernal pools have been located. Lang responds that the location of all vernal pools will be added to the map. He then explains that Cassidy and himself have begun to identify some of them, and notes that most of them appear on City owned property besides one that is located on the Maestranzi property. Lang states that Ron Johnson could better update the commission on the location of vernal pools. Johnson states that Douglas is correct in his review of vernal pools, but that there might possibly be one more on the Parker Brothers site. Lang states that he will have better graphics by the next meeting that will give the commission a broder idea of what the commission will be beginning with and what we'll end up with. Lang notes that the vernal pools will also be identified at that time. Lawler asks with respect to a usage plan, that if an area is a wetland does that mean it remain undisturbed forever, or does the City or the developer have options in treating/transforming a wetland. Lang explains that any wetland is under the jurisdiction of the Conservation Commission, and that the Conservation Commission has in the past required that the wetlands be replicated. Lawler asks for example, if this commission finds a spot that would be good for a soccer field and there is a wetland running through it, what would happen. Lang states that vernal pools can't be moved, and that any lower priority wetlands would have to be considered by the Conservation Commission. Martin asks if the members have any more questions on the mapping. There are none. Next, members get an update from Frost regarding the pump station. He explains what he has been working on, noting that he has been in contact with the Environmeneal Study Office of Mt. Holyoke regarding their two ponds; that he has been gathering information on a management programwith respect to hydro-raking; and gathering information on an annual maintenance program. Frost explains that he did a site walk on March 13, 1998 with the City Engineer, that they went back to the orange stream and found it again to be orange color, that they pulled two manhole covers, the first manhole was 2' deep in water, but not part of the system and the other manhole Norwood Pond Commission April 1, 1998 Meeting Page Three by the North Shore Music Theater was dry. Frost states that he feels that the manholes are not the problem. Frost then explains that he went back to the stream and that Frank Killilea went in a different direction to research another area and found down in the valley another body of orange water. Frost states that they pulled samples out of the stream, but that the results are not back yet, that they went over the landfill and found the pump to be inactive and water overflowing the leaching area. Next, Frost passes out to members photo's he took during the site walk and a second batch of photo's concerning the leaching field, storm water, and the general lay of the land. McMahonquestions whether or not it is Frost's opinion that because the pump was not functioning that there was an overflow of water, and if the pump was functioning, there might not be as much water. Frost states yes, that is my opinion. Douglas asks if the red light goes on when the pump is functioning or malfunctioning, and questions who owns the pump. Frost states that he believes that the red light indicates that the pump is malfunctioning, and that the City owns the pump. Douglas asks whether or not Killilea had a key. Frost states no he didn't. Frost explains that they did find out that part of the problem is that this area maybe a main recharge source for Norwood Pond. Douglas states that if the pump was working then the water would be pumped out and drained toward Essex Street. Frost states that he is not sure where the pump is supposed to drain to. McMahon states that the pump shouldn't be pumping leachate into the sewer system or any fresh water supply. Lang notes that the tributary of Norwood Pond had abnormal results and that it should be retested. Frost also adds that on the site walk Ray Talkingtan from the environmental firm TEEM recommended another company Baystate Environmental, which has produced books/information on some of the projects they have done, in addition to a rough feasibility study. Cassidy suggests that one of the books be placed into the general file. Frost provided her with a copy. Norwood Pond Commission April 1, 1998 Meeting Page Four Frost suggests that the commission do a background check on consultants they are considering. Cassidy states that commission should also get references. any the McMahon states that there was some work done on Chebacco Lake and asked if anyone from that project has been contacted. Frost states no, that last he knew they got a bond for the dredging, and that that it took an awful long time to get the permits to do the project. Lang asks if a test well was set up at the Landfill. Frost responds no, and states that samples were taken from three different spots/areas: at the leaching field pump, at the orange stream, and at the mouth of the pond where the tributary enters. A site visit to the former landfill site off Otis Road is rescheduled for Saturday, April 25, 1998 at 9:00 a.m. with participants to meet on Otis Road. Kevin Burke joins the meeting at this time. (8:10 p.m.) Next, Martin discusses an article he read and copied regarding the "Ipswich River Park" project in North Reading. He explains that the article addresses a lot of similar issues that the commission will be doing for the Norwood Pond project. Cassidy states that it is a good idea to do a site visit in the Summer. Next, Douglas updates members regarding a preliminary process Cassidy and himself are doing to identify the wetlands and vernal pools in the Norwood Pond site area, and points out potential land areas for development/potential use. He shows the members a topographic configuration of various areas around the Norwood Pond site, and then explains that he took that and made an overlay to delineate where those areas are. Douglas states that once the process began to unfold, it was clear to him, that if there is to be some development in this area that the commission should focus on the roadway infrastructure system that serves it, and states that there is a possibility of a ramping system for the overpass. Douglas states that the map targets particular considerations, City owned land, open space and land already zoned for industrial uses.' Next, Douglas discusses the possibility of developing access and egress ramps in the vicinity of Rt. 128, and a ramping system into the roadway, and states that there is approximately 25-30 acres of developable land. · Bu!~aa~ a~ Bu!ulno[pR alo~aq dnolB a~ ssalpp~ o~ ~s!M oqM D!iqnd a~ ~o slagam Xu~ aH 'II~H E~!D ~ 'm'd 0E:L ~e 866I '9 ~ 'XepsaupaM uo pla~ aq II!~ uo!ss!mmoD a~ ~o 6u!~aa~ ~InBa~ ~xau aq~ aIdoad ~D~UOD O~ spaau uolss~mmoo a~ ~eR~ sa~s a~=n~ pue E~I~aAO S,BUe7 ~a6 Uaq~ 'aM!I sMooI E~I~aAO eR~ ~ aas/a~aq o~ ~uawau!~aI awos spaau d~m sir ~ sa~s s~iBnoG fXeM~B~H ss~R ~o u~A!iinS U!AaM ~D~UOD pinoqs uo~ss~mmoD a~ aphid u~ aI~ sd~w aouo ~q~ sa~s u~R :auop aq o~ spaau ~ d~De~ s2aq~xaw '~xaN 'X~ado~d =al~a~& D!snN a~oqS q~oN uo pa~eDoI s! II!~pue7 -peoH ,,ureyunG ~eau,, se pa~!~uap~ a~!s a~s~ snopi~z~ aq~ ~y~ ~no puno~ pue d~G pe~oe~uoo a~s ~e~ slaquxa~ s~Io~ul EplsseD '~xaN 'aBpa ,s~a~M a~ o~ asoiD I~a~ se~e~s aM~nfl 'oq o] Bu!oB Bu!pIlnq a~ sam puod 9~ o~ asoio Mo~ 'uol~eDoI a~s e s~ EiIaAa~ Bul~aplsuoo se~ aBaIIoD/~lunmmoD a~ogS ~oN ua~ sMse ~adur~7 · aa~ pu~I~a~ s! ~eqM aas plnoqs uo!ss!mmo3 aq~ ~q~ saa~Be ~ad~eq -uo!~saBBns s,uo~D~ ~!~ slnDuoo aMIn~ '~no paMIOM aq ue3 ~M ssnos~p pu~ u~op ~s uay~ pue sKeI~aAo dam ey~ aas pue ~!~ uo!ss!~l~/oo ay~ ~e~ s~saBBns uo~e~D~ '5uT~aam 86/~ ag~ mol~ sieoB s,uoTssTmmoo aq~ auT~ap ~a~aq o~ ~ueM Zaq~ ~T s~aqmam sMse uT~e~ '~xaN · aBpaI~ouM .s~auMo aq~ q~!~ sdeq~ad 'KIIeD!~o~s!g oo padmnp uaaq ~oe~ u! seq pueI !zue~sa~ ~o uo!~od e ~g~ sa~ou KplsseD 'puno~B Bu!dmnp ag~ pu-e !zu~seeN aq~ g~M ~alqold e aq pIno~ a~aq~ ~ s~se uu~iD3N · ~uTod sTq~ ~e KeM~BTH sseH 5UTAIOAUT ~O pea~suT uMop ~eM s;T M;o~ pue do; aq~ ~e ~;e~s o~ spaau uoTssTmmoo e~ 3~ 'BuTiaAnauem IeDT~Tiod ~sn~ s,~T salads laiMeI 'IIaM s~ ea;~ ~eq~ uT spuei~a~ ~o ;aqarnu aq~ a~emT~sa zapun ~ou o~ pue 'ease ~eq~ uT plaT~ 6uTqDeaI ~ sT a~aq~ ~eQ~ saAalIaq aq ~q~ sa~e~s 6ue7 'X~!D ay~ y~!M M~OM o~ o~qseH ~o~ aA!~uaou! ~o ~oI e aq pIno~ a~ay~ ~ey~ sa~s selBnoG 'paAIOAU~ aq O~ ~ue~ ~ay~ yDn~ Moy ~o~ Iaa~ se ~a~ o~ ozqseH ~o~ saA!~e~uesa~da~ se iIe~ se 'Bu!~aa~ ~uanbasqns e o~ s~aau!Dua XeMqD~q a~AH! UO~SS~U~OD ag~ ~ s~saD6ns amen~ · seale alqe!A/~uamdolaAap ie!~uap!sal_uou Ie~ua~od o~ ~oadsa~ q~!M abets Xleu!m!iald aq~ u! Eluo s! dam ~] saints s~IBno~ 'pam~o~u~ uaaq se~ ~eMgB!H sse~ ~! sMs~ aATa abed 8661 'I IT~dV uoTssTmmoD puod poota~oN Norwood Pond Commission April 1, 1998 Meeting Page Six McGlynn extends a thank you to all the commission members who did so much work for tonights meeting. Bill Coughlin suggested that the commission find out what the red light on at the pumping station indicates. Frost states that he is sure that if the light is on, the pump is not working. Lawler agrees that a red light usually means that there has been a malfunction. Renee Mary notes that if there is a failure of a major pumping system a warning goes off, and asks if this is the same thing. Cassidy states that she is not sure, that the system might be old enough that it is a separate system. Bill Coughlin asks if Maestranzi has asked the City to remediate his land for dumping on his property. Cassidy states that she doesn't honestly know. McMahon states that she recalls that there is a line item in the Budget that the City does pay Maestranzi for something. Bill Coughlin asks if there are any other considerations for more entrances to the pond than from just Route 128. Burke explains that the school area will give us two entrances. Ron Johnson reinforces the fact that vernal pools can't be replicated, that they need to stay as is, and that the big wetlands have to be protected; he states that the "Ipswich River Park" project article scares him and that he hopes that a large portion of the land is kept as conservation land; that he would like to see the hiking trails kept as is; that he has a problem with the wetlands by Hasbro; and that he feels that if the road leading into Parker Brothers is disturbed that it could go into wetlands and will destroy that area. He also states that there seems to be a general consent to develop as much of the land as possible, and · recommends that the commission be cautious, that it might not be the best thing for the area, that there are a lot of conservation issues, and that there could be impact on conservation wetlands by Maestranzi. He suggests that the commission get out there and look at the land, that he would like to keep as much land as possible as conservation areas. Martin states that he wants to make clear that he is not suggesting that the commission copy exactly what was done at the Ipswich River Park. Elise Bornstein from the public states that she is concerned with the industrial goal, and states that the area should be allowed to be preserved as is. Norwood Pond Commission April 1, 1998 Meeting Page Seven Renee Mary questions how the commuters getting back home from Route 128 taking Exit 18 will get Off. Douglas states that there will be no change in that area. Martin asks if there are any other members of the public who wish to speak. There are none. Lamperr: motion to adjourn, seconded by McMahon. All members in favor, motion carries. Meeting is adjourned at 9:15 p.m.