Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
2001-01-09CITY OF BEVERLY
Public Meeting Minutes
BOARD: Conservation Commission
SUBCOMMITTEE:
DATE: January 9, 2001
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman David Lang, Anthony Paluzzi, Dr. Mayo Johnson,
Jon Mazuy, Pat Grimes, and Jay Donnelly
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Richard Benevento
OTHERS PRESENT: Debra Hurlburt, Assistant Planning Director
RECORDER: Jeannine Dion
Chairman Lang calls the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m.
Certificate of Compliance
Landfill
Frank Killilea introduces Bob Winn, Project Manager from Malcolm Pernie to address questions
asked at the site visit. Winn provides a letter to the Commission with revised drawings
delineating the old/new wetlands and an updated wetland monitoring report. The wetlands have
increased by .18 acres.
Mazuy asks if the area on the northern side is subject to erosion and asks if it is now stable
enough to prevent further erosion. Winn responds that area (Wetland A) is stable.
Lang asks if the contractor is bound to go back to the original drawing. Winn responds that there
was erosion that affected Wetland A. The contractor needs to remove a silt fence but, due to
winter conditions, he can not remove it now. The city will hold $5,000 until the fence is removed.
Mazuy asks if it would be prudent to wait on issuing a Certificate of Compliance until the fence is
removed. Winn responds that he is not sure if that would be fair to the contractor and $5,000
should be enough money to hold for clean up.
Donnelly states that the overall size of the amount of wetland is greater than before and
recommends the Commission condition the removal of the silt fence.
Pam Kampersal provides pictures of the landfill and the leachate pump (before it was fixed) and
expresses concern about an orange stream and its proximity to Norwood Pond. She states
because of the history, there is potential for contaminants to have been dumped. Previous testing
has not been conclusive and she requests more testing.
Lang states he would like to restore Wetland A to its original size. Mazuy agrees.
Conservation Commission Meeting Minutes
January 9, 2001
Page 2
Lang asks members what to do about the leachate issue. Dr. Johnson asks if the discoloration
could be coming from other sites near the landfill (for example: the music theater, Montserrat
College of Art, etc.). He recommends testing.
Killilea offers to send someone out to determine if the leachate is coming from new sources or
residuals from the landfill.
Lang asks when the Commission could receive the report. Killilea responds that he can provide a
verbal report by the next Conservation Commission meeting. He adds that better conditions may
be needed to be more precise.
Killilea agrees to test the water to determine the source.
Paluzzi moves to issue a Certificate of Compliance pending the results of the testing, seconded by
Mazuy. Donnelly opposed. (5-1). Motion carries.
Request for Determination of Applicability
Sam Fonzo Drive - Fonzo Realty Trust and City of Beverly
Elizabeth Wallace from Hayes Engineering appears on behalf of the applicant. She states the
applicant is requesting the Conservation Commission to review and approve wetlands, wetland
lines and upper resource areas on the Sam Fonzo site. Most of the lines were brought before the
Commission in 1996 and approved by the DEP in a Superseding Determination dated 1997. The
reason why the applicant is before the Conservation Commission again is because the Superseding
Order is expiring this year and the applicant would like to renew the approval of the wetland
resource areas under the Wetland Protection Act. The applicant is using most of the same
wetland lines with the exception of a few.
Mazuy asks how many flags would need to be replaced. Wallace responds that most of the
original flags are not in place and would need to be replaced. A new flagging would not take
place.
Mazuy states the Commission would like to see the location of the flags before they go out to
visit the site.
Lang expresses concern about the accuracy of the replacement of the flags and snow. He
suggests continuing in March or April.
Conservation Commission Meeting Minutes
January 9, 2001
Page 3
Wallace requests continuing the hearing to the first meeting in February, which will enable flag
replacement. If the weather conditions have not improved, the applicant will request continuation
to a later date.
Mazuy moves to continue the hearing to the first meeting in February, seconded by Paluzzi. All
members in favor. Motion carries.
Notice of Intent
275 Hale Street - in-ground swimming pool, retaining wall, landscaping - Silsby
Hurlburt states the Commission received a request from Angela Silsby requesting an extension to
the January 30, 2001 meeting.
Paluzzi moves to continue the hearing to January 30, 2001, second by Grimes. All members in
favor. Motion carries.
Meadow Road/Lot 10 - BVW filling & home construction - Pica
Mark Jacobs appears on behalf of the applicant. He states the lot is a 12,000 square foot lot.
Replacement wetlands were constructed across the street and a Certificate of Compliance was
issued. The applicant is proposing to construct a single family home and 1,776 square feet of
wetlands on the property. Jacobs states the proposed replication combined with the wetlands
already replicated across Meadow Road would meet the performance standards for BVW impact.
The applicant understands the Conservation Commission’s “angst” regarding the fact that the
applicant is taking credit for wetlands across the street. He reminds the Commission that the
wetland replication across the street was approved and related to wetland impacts on this lot 14
years ago. Jacobs admits that would not “pass muster” by today’s standards.
Lang asks if soil samples were taken. Jacobs responds that as standard operating procedures he
checks the soils – for example, he observes soils both above and below wetland boundaries while
delineating, however, does not document vegetation.
Lang asks if the applicant has considered the recommendation of the Commission to reconsider
where the house location is being proposed. Jacobs responds that there were several reasons the
applicant chose not to move the proposed house location: 1) the applicant would still be required
to fill some wetlands; 2) if the applicant flip flopped the house location, it would disrupt the
drainage, and 3) the homeowner would like a functional yard.
Lang states at the site visit, there was discussion about putting the house on the upland side and
the Commission recommended speaking with the ZBA regarding seeking relief for the setbacks.
Jacobs responds it would be highly unlikely to get relief, in terms of a variance, because the
applicant meets all the performance standards of the Wetland Protection Act. It is difficult to
prove hardship when you can meet all the performance standards.
Lang asks if there are any questions from the public.
Conservation Commission Meeting Minutes
January 9, 2001
Page 4
Stella Mae Seamans, 840 Hale Street asks if the applicant would consider siting the house on the
upland side. Jacobs responds that the applicant is not looking for a large yard – they would like
to have some yard, however.
Mazuy moves to close the hearing, seconded by Paluzzi. All members in favor. Motion carries.
106 West Street - septic upgrade - Nugent
Julie Parrino from Hancock Environmental Consulting appears on behalf of the applicant. The
applicant has a failed septic system and is seeking permission to install a new one in front of the
house. The lot is long, narrow and surrounded by wetlands. The applicant is requesting several
variances from the Board of Health and will be meeting with the Board of Health in two weeks.
The septic system will be outside the flood plain and the flood way.
Mazuy asks if there are alternative locations for the septic system. Parrino responds the proposed
location is the only one which will meet the regulations.
Donnelly asks what would prevent the new septic system from failing. Parrino responds that the
new septic system will be constructed four feet above groundwater.
Mazuy states when there are heavy rains, that the whole area is under ground. Parrino responds
that the location where the septic system is being proposed is an elevation higher than the
estimated 100-year flood plain.
Donnelly asks if the applicant would be willing continue the hearing to evaluate alternatives.
Parrino responds she would have to speak with the engineer.
Lang states he would like to see more information on elevations and recommends the applicant
provide a cross-section of the ground surface.
Parrino states the Board of Health will evaluate the septic system and its components more
closely.
Mazuy asks if tying into the force main on Beach Street has been considered. Parrino responds
that she does not know.
Paluzzi moves to continue the hearing to January 30, 2001, seconded by Mazuy. All members in
favor. Motion carries.
Conservation Commission Meeting Minutes
January 9, 2001
Page 5
Order of Conditions
Meadow Road/Lot 10 - BVW filling & home construction
Grimes asks how the board members feel about the wetlands created 14 years ago. Lang
responds that it does not conform to today’s standards. He adds that he has a problem with the
hydrology, vegetation and difference in elevation.
Mazuy states the area under consideration for development will result in higher water levels. He
adds that if this is marginal, he could not pass on it.
Paluzzi expresses his opposition.
Johnson moves to issue an Order of Conditions for Lot 10, Meadow Road, seconded by Paluzzi.
Motion fails 1-4-1. Johnson in favor. Paluzzi, Grimes, Mazuy and Lang opposed. Donnelly
abstains.
Lang expresses the following concerns:
1. There was very little soil information for the Commission to make a determination,
2. Do not think the applicant can meet the Performance Standards by having an area of
compensation be 14 year old as well as not being contiguous to the property,
3. If the applicant proposed to move the house upland or seek permission from the Zoning
Board of Appeal, the proposal would have been more palatable.
Certificates of Compliance
DEP File #5-676 - Lot 5, Meeting Place Circle - Thomas Neve Associates
Hurlburt states she visited the site and due to the snow conditions was unable to determine if the
site is stable.
Paluzzi moves to table this item until the snow is gone, seconded by Dr. Johnson. All members in
favor. Motion carries.
DEP File #5-543 - Glen Urquhart School - Meridian Engineering
Hurlburt states the applicant is seeking a partial Certificate of Compliance because only a portion
of the project was constructed. The pool and cabana were not.
David Gosselin, Meridian Engineering represents the applicant. He states he is requesting a
Certificate of Compliance on an outstanding Order of Conditions. Approximately one year ago
Conservation Commission Meeting Minutes
January 9, 2001
Page 6
the applicant requested an extension to construct the pool and cabana. The school decided not to
proceed with the project at this time and accordingly would like to close out the Certificate of
Compliance.
Paluzzi moves to issue a Partial Certificate of Compliance, seconded by Donnelly. All members in
favor. Motion carries.
DEP File #5-654 - Common Lane - Steve Wickers/Hayes Engineering
Mazuy is concerned about the height of the driveway and the way it is constructed. It could still
be subject to spilling over to the street.
Donnelly states he would like to see what happens when it thaws – in the late winter to early
springtime.
Wickers states he increased some of the pavement on the driveway on the left-hand side. There
have been numerous rainstorms and there is no run off.
Donnelly states he would like to see how much erosion occurs, now that the driveway is paved,
and what affect it has on the stream.
Mazuy expresses concern that the pavement could affect the conditions at the base of the hill.
Lang recommends that the applicant come back in March or April when the snow has gone or is
reduced.
Wickers states everything else was done perfectly and he would like to get this complete.
Lang advises Wickers to take photographs and contact Hurlburt at the end of the winter to update
her.
All parties agree to table until March, 2001.
Old/New Business
Letter from Pam Kampersal
Hurlburt reads a letter from Pam Kampersal (Norwood Pond Association) dated January 2, 2001
into record.
Lang states Frank Killilea agreed to perform water tests, inspect the area and report the results at
the end of the month. He recommends all Conservation Commission members to visit the area.
Kampersal states the Norwood Pond Association believes that the orange water can be a red flag
of the presence of contaminants.
Conservation Commission Meeting Minutes
January 9, 2001
Page 7
Paluzzi moves to send a letter to Frank Killilea confirming that water tests will be taken by
January 30, 2001 and that an inspector determine the origin of the leachate in the orange stream,
second by Mazuy. All members in favor. Motion carries.
DEP letter regarding Final Order of Resource Area Delineation /Endicott
Hurlburt informs the members that DEP has issued a Final Order of Resource Area Delineation
concurring and upholding the Conservation Commission’s delineation.
Letter from Ansello at 9 Pine Knoll Drive
Hurlburt reads a letter from Alan and Jean Ansello into the record regarding an open stream
which runs through their property. They express concern about a foul odor and high levels of
contaminants.
Donnelly suggests that the Commission write a letter to Frank Killilea requesting he identify the
source of contamination.
Alan Ansello states he has spoken with several departments and the matter keeps getting passed
around. The stream ran very clear and there definitely has been an impact on the wetlands and his
property. He states he just needs to know where to start.
Jean Ansello states she has spoken with Frank Killilea and he stated the city would conduct a dye
test and get back to her with the results. She has not heard back from him. She expresses
concern about having an open septic stream on her property and that she has asked several people
to test the sediment and they will not.
Donnelly expresses concern that the wetlands are being polluted and agrees that the city should
identify the source.
Claude Lemoi, 7 Pine Knoll Drive concurs with the Ansellos’ complaint about the stream. He has
lived in home for 20 years and up until 2 years ago the stream was always clear. When the
Planter’s subdivision (Wentworth Drive) was being planned, resident expressed concern about
pollution of the water caused by the development. He has called Frank Killilea’s office many
times and has never received a return call.
Lang states that this reading is a very high bacteria levels and recommends sending a letter to the
Health Department (Bill Burke) with a copy to Frank Killilea recommending they work together
on this matter.
Conservation Commission Meeting Minutes
January 9, 2001
Page 8
Jean Ansello states the contractor for the subdivision did not put traps on two of the storm drains.
Lang states the Conservation Commission will check the Certificate of Compliance for the
Planter’s subdivision and recommends the Ansellos check with the Conservation Commission
Agent for any updates on the matter.
Other
Vitale Site
Lang states Health Link wants to apply for a grant to hire a contractor to investigate the fly ash at
the Vitale site. The city is doing some testing now but Health Link would like to do more testing.
He believes it is always better to have many eyes looking at one set of information so nothing is
missed.
Mazuy moves to write a letter in support of Health Link’s grant application, seconded by
Donnelly. All members in favor. Motion carries.
Conservation Commission Web Page
Hurlburt asks members to provide comments or additions to the proposed Conservation
Commission Web site. The Web site will include forms, resource area identification cross
sections, list of vernal pools and will have several links.
Cabot Street - Nadeau
Hurlburt states Mr. Nadeau wants to raise the elevation of his property two feet and is looking for
a minor modification to do that. He has approval to raise the property four feet but wants to raise
it an additional two feet.
Lang asks for Nadeau to provide a cross-section that shows where the house will be and where
the toe of the slope will be.
Self Help Grant
Hurlburt states the city has received a Self-Help Grant in the amount of $250,000 to aid in the
purchase of the Santin property. Hurlburt asks for signatures of three members of the
Conservation Commission.
Approval of Minutes
Paluzzi moves to approve the minutes dated November 27, 2000, seconded by Dr. Johnson.
Grimes, Paluzzi and Dr. Johnson in favor. Donnelly and Mazuy abstain. Motion carries.
Paluzzi moves to adjourn, seconded by Mazuy. All members in favor. Motion carries.
The meeting adjourns at 9:45 p.m.